Roger
2004-11-16 14:21:50 UTC
Bought a Comag DTT receiver model DVB-T in Lidl on Monday.
In Short:
It was far too insensitive / faulty and I took it back for a refund.
In detail:
The box doesn't appear to have a model number other than DVB-T.
Brief spec:
The box does have EPG.
Connectivity: (on rear)
Two scarts, (only selectable options: RGB /Composite)
5 pin din S-Video
Optical digital o/p
Phono socket co-axial digital o/p
Phono trio: Composite video, left & right audio.
RS232 9 pin connector (for upgrade via PC - over air also possible)
Aerial loop through. (No modulator)
Power on/off switch
Power lead cannot be detached.
No conditional access slot- (didn't open box)
I connected it up in place of a Philips DTR 1500 that was working perfectly
satisfactorily.
Scanning for channels:
After auto scanning, there were only a few stations displayed.
Manually scanning each mux produced something from each, but in the final
analysis there were only 28 stations shown out of a possible 58 or so.
Indicated signal strength across the muxes varied from 20 to 28%
I live in an area of good signal strength and these indications compare
unfavourably with my Philips DTR 1500, typically 75% signal strength;
Nokia 9850T- signal strength 100%; Pace 735 -signal strength 80%. All of
which receive all available channels without difficulty. I concluded that
either I had a duff box or the receiver was so insensitive that it was only
useable in areas of exceptionally high signal strength.
Baffling terminology:
For non technical viewers the set up screen is very confusing, making
reference to 'Transponders' and asking which 'mux' (from a list in another
pane) the receiver is to scan. By 'Transponder' they mean frequency in
MHz and by 'mux' they mean the transmitter channel allocation but presented
in a rather unusual way.
The 'muxes' are shown as transmitter channel allocations plus frequency.
e.g. a transmitter having digital channels of 23, 28, 30, 32, the 'muxes'
would be 23 490000, 28 530000, 30 546000, and 32 562000, - selected from a
complete set from 10-60. Baffling for non technical users!
There is also the option of selecting guard band (1/4,1/8, 1/32 or
whatever) and mode (2K or 8K) and 'FTA only' or 'all'.
Other observations:
There was 'something odd' about the presentation of the station list.
The list could be sorted by various options, but the 'normal' listing:
Ch 1=BBC 1, ch 2=BBC 2, ch 10=BBC 4, ch 40=BBC news 24.
didn't appear to be one of the options.
Previously I bought a Comag SL55 digital satellite receiver from Lidl and
I'm pleased with the results. I had hoped this receiver -which IMO is
quite pricey- would be as satisfactory, offering the advantage of 7 day
EPG. I also liked the good connectivity but for me lack of S-video on
either scart is a significant drawback.
It was disappointing to take the box back but 60 pounds is a lot for a
dodgy box to keep as novelty value. At the store there was no problem
getting a refund, the drawback being they don't refund there and then but
take name and address for refund by cheque in the post.
ISTM there is a question of how much signal strength should be sufficient
for a box to work properly. AFAIK know manufacturers do not provide such a
bench mark, but perhaps someone can advise.
I would be interested to hear experience of anyone else who bought one.
Roger
In Short:
It was far too insensitive / faulty and I took it back for a refund.
In detail:
The box doesn't appear to have a model number other than DVB-T.
Brief spec:
The box does have EPG.
Connectivity: (on rear)
Two scarts, (only selectable options: RGB /Composite)
5 pin din S-Video
Optical digital o/p
Phono socket co-axial digital o/p
Phono trio: Composite video, left & right audio.
RS232 9 pin connector (for upgrade via PC - over air also possible)
Aerial loop through. (No modulator)
Power on/off switch
Power lead cannot be detached.
No conditional access slot- (didn't open box)
I connected it up in place of a Philips DTR 1500 that was working perfectly
satisfactorily.
Scanning for channels:
After auto scanning, there were only a few stations displayed.
Manually scanning each mux produced something from each, but in the final
analysis there were only 28 stations shown out of a possible 58 or so.
Indicated signal strength across the muxes varied from 20 to 28%
I live in an area of good signal strength and these indications compare
unfavourably with my Philips DTR 1500, typically 75% signal strength;
Nokia 9850T- signal strength 100%; Pace 735 -signal strength 80%. All of
which receive all available channels without difficulty. I concluded that
either I had a duff box or the receiver was so insensitive that it was only
useable in areas of exceptionally high signal strength.
Baffling terminology:
For non technical viewers the set up screen is very confusing, making
reference to 'Transponders' and asking which 'mux' (from a list in another
pane) the receiver is to scan. By 'Transponder' they mean frequency in
MHz and by 'mux' they mean the transmitter channel allocation but presented
in a rather unusual way.
The 'muxes' are shown as transmitter channel allocations plus frequency.
e.g. a transmitter having digital channels of 23, 28, 30, 32, the 'muxes'
would be 23 490000, 28 530000, 30 546000, and 32 562000, - selected from a
complete set from 10-60. Baffling for non technical users!
There is also the option of selecting guard band (1/4,1/8, 1/32 or
whatever) and mode (2K or 8K) and 'FTA only' or 'all'.
Other observations:
There was 'something odd' about the presentation of the station list.
The list could be sorted by various options, but the 'normal' listing:
Ch 1=BBC 1, ch 2=BBC 2, ch 10=BBC 4, ch 40=BBC news 24.
didn't appear to be one of the options.
Previously I bought a Comag SL55 digital satellite receiver from Lidl and
I'm pleased with the results. I had hoped this receiver -which IMO is
quite pricey- would be as satisfactory, offering the advantage of 7 day
EPG. I also liked the good connectivity but for me lack of S-video on
either scart is a significant drawback.
It was disappointing to take the box back but 60 pounds is a lot for a
dodgy box to keep as novelty value. At the store there was no problem
getting a refund, the drawback being they don't refund there and then but
take name and address for refund by cheque in the post.
ISTM there is a question of how much signal strength should be sufficient
for a box to work properly. AFAIK know manufacturers do not provide such a
bench mark, but perhaps someone can advise.
I would be interested to hear experience of anyone else who bought one.
Roger